Re: Clarification for patch 7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 07:40:09PM -0800, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> Hi Christoffer, Marc -
>    in stage2_dissolve_pmd() CONFIG_SMP is
> unnecessary. At the time huge page is write protected,
> until it faults and is cleared any page in the range
> may be dirty not just the gpa access that caused the
> fault.
> 
> The comment on another CPU is wrong, I
> confused myself while testing it should not be possible for
> another CPU to write to same PMD range while
> another is handling its PMD fault. I ran a test with
> only initrd which exposed an issue using my
> test scenario, QEMU appears fine.
> 
> It also depends on user space if you first turn
> on logging, do pre-copy then marking just the page
> is enough. It's hard to interpret the API in this
> case. It just says dirty pages since the last
> call.
> 
> That patch could be resent without upsetting
> the rest.
> 

I think I raised all these issues on your patch, let's discuss it there.

-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux