Re: Why do additional cores reduce performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 16/12/2014 17:22, Oleg Ovechko wrote:
>> What is your benchmark?
> 
> I've tried different ways (CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3 x64, ATTO Disk
> Banchmark v2.47) all give same result.

All are run on the AHCI passthrough disk(s), right?

> When everything is enabled in BIOS it is 6:23 on real Windows versus
> 9:03 on virtualized...
> 
> Phil Ehrens has sent me link
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2014-10/msg00036.html
> If I don't misunderstand, it means kvm/qemu simply is not designed for
> multi-threading.

No, it means TCG does not support multithreading.  KVM does, and you are
using it.

> I guess I need to try different hypervisor. 50% performance is too
> high price especially when VT-x and VT-d are meant to make it 0%

It is surprising to me too.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux