On 25/11/2014 21:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2014, Rik van Riel wrote: >> On 11/25/2014 12:21 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >>> Since lapic timer handler only wakes up a simple waitqueue, >>> it can be executed from hardirq context. >>> >>> Reduces average cyclictest latency by 3us. >> >> Can this patch be merged in the KVM tree, and go >> upstream via Paolo? > > Not really as it has RT dependencies .... Can hrtimer_start_expires even return ETIME on a non-RT kernel? If yes, I can take patch 2. If not, it's better to keep both patches in the RT tree. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
