Am Thursday 26 February 2009 13:43:54 schrieb Avi Kivity: > > Declaring struct kvm_ioapic should help. > Better to limit the declaration to archs that have ioapics... do we have > a KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC define? Something like (works on s390, not tested on x86)? [PATCH] kvm: use ioapic functions only on affected hardware From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> Since " KVM: Unify the delivery of IOAPIC and MSI interrupts" I get the following warnings: CC [M] arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.o In file included from arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:22: include/linux/kvm_host.h:357: warning: 'struct kvm_ioapic' declared inside parameter list include/linux/kvm_host.h:357: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want This patch limits IOAPIC functions for architectures that have one. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> --- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Index: kvm/include/linux/kvm_host.h =================================================================== --- kvm.orig/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ kvm/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -352,9 +352,11 @@ void kvm_unregister_irq_mask_notifier(st struct kvm_irq_mask_notifier *kimn); void kvm_fire_mask_notifiers(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool mask); +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC void kvm_get_intr_delivery_bitmask(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *entry, unsigned long *deliver_bitmask); +#endif int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int irq, int level); void kvm_notify_acked_irq(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin); void kvm_register_irq_ack_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
