On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> > {
> > + /*
> > + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> > + * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set up.
>
> Where does it say that?
Hmpf, may have imagined that.
This means we either need to track whether used/avail have been
specified or calculated or move responsibility for re-calculation of
used/avail for the old layout into the callers.
>
> > + */
> > + if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) &&
> > + vdev->vq[n].vring.desc) {
> > + error_report("tried to modify buffer num for virtio-1 device");
> > + return;
> > + }
> > /* Don't allow guest to flip queue between existent and
> > * nonexistent states, or to set it to an invalid size.
> > */
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
