Re: Seeking a KVM benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paolo,
On 11/17/14, 7:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 17/11/2014 12:17, Wanpeng Li wrote:
It's not surprising [1].  Since the meaning of some PTE bits change [2],
the TLB has to be flushed.  In VMX we have VPIDs, so we only need to flush
if EFER changed between two invocations of the same VPID, which isn't
the case.
If there need a TLB flush if guest is UP?
The wrmsr is in the host, and the TLB flush is done in the processor
microcode.

Sorry, maybe I didn't state my question clearly. As Avi mentioned above "In VMX we have VPIDs, so we only need to flush if EFER changed between two invocations of the same VPID", so there is only one VPID if the guest is UP, my question is if there need a TLB flush when guest's EFER has been changed?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li


Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux