Re: Seeking a KVM benchmark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:26:29PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/11/2014 16:22, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > Nehalem results:
> >> > 
> >> > userspace exit, urn                      17560 17726 17628 17572 17417
> >> > lightweight exit, urn                     3316  3342  3342  3319  3328
> >> > userspace exit, LOAD_EFER, guest!=host   12200 11772 12130 12164 12327
> >> > lightweight exit, LOAD_EFER, guest!=host  3214  3220  3238  3218  3337
> >> > userspace exit, LOAD_EFER, guest=host    11983 11780 11920 11919 12040
> >> > lightweight exit, LOAD_EFER, guest=host   3178  3193  3193  3187  3220
> >> > 
> > Is this with Andy's patch that skips LOAD_EFER when guest=host, or the one
> > that always switch LOAD_EFER?
> 
> Skip LOAD_EFER when guest=host.
> 
So guest=host is a little bit better than guest!=host so looks like skipping LOAD_EFER helps, but
why "lightweight exit, urn" worse than guest=host though, it should be exactly the same as long as NX
bit is the same in urn test, no?

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux