On 2014/11/10 14:26, Feng Wu wrote: > We don't need to migrate the irqs for VT-d Posted-Interrtups here. > When 'pst' is set in IRTE, the associated irq will be posted to > guests instead of interrupt remapping. The destination of the > interrupt is set in Posted-Interrupts Descriptor, and the migration > happens during VCPU scheduling. > > Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c > index 87c02fe..249e2b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c > @@ -1038,6 +1038,13 @@ intel_ioapic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask, > if (get_irte(irq, &irte)) > return -EBUSY; > > + /* > + * If the interrupt is for posting, it is used by guests, > + * we cannot change IRTE here. > + */ > + if (irte.irq_post_low.pst == 1) > + return 0; Hi Feng, You should return some error code instead of 0, otherwise the irq core will get confused. > + > err = assign_irq_vector(irq, cfg, mask); > if (err) > return err; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
