Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: kvm: drop inappropriate use of kvm_is_mmio_pfn()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10 November 2014 11:57, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:33:55AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Instead of using kvm_is_mmio_pfn() to decide whether a host region
>> should be stage 2 mapped with device attributes, add a new static
>> function kvm_is_device_pfn() that disregards RAM pages with the
>> reserved bit set, as those should usually not be mapped as device
>> memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 7 ++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 57a403a5c22b..b007438242e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -834,6 +834,11 @@ static bool kvm_is_write_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>       return kvm_vcpu_dabt_iswrite(vcpu);
>>  }
>>
>> +static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
>> +{
>> +     return !pfn_valid(pfn);
>> +}
>
> So this works for Magnus' use case, because a device tree memreserve
> results in reserved, but valid, existing pages being backed by a struct
> page?
>

That is the idea, yes, but it would be good if he could confirm that
it works as expected.

Also, there may be some corner cases where pfn_valid returns false for
regions that are in fact mapped as MT_NORMAL by the host kernel, i.e.,
UEFI configuration tables, for instance, so this test may require
further refinement. But it at least eliminates the false positives for
plain memreserve regions.


>> +
>>  static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>>                         struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
>>                         unsigned long fault_status)
>> @@ -904,7 +909,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>>       if (is_error_pfn(pfn))
>>               return -EFAULT;
>>
>> -     if (kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn))
>> +     if (kvm_is_device_pfn(pfn))
>>               mem_type = PAGE_S2_DEVICE;
>>
>>       spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>>
>
> If my understanding above is correct, then:
>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux