On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:04:21 -0700 Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is there ever a time where the VMAs under an mm have mixed VM_NOZEROPAGE > status? Reading the patches, it _looks_ like it might be an all or > nothing thing. Currently it is an all or nothing thing, but for a future change we might want to just tag the guest memory instead of the complete user address space. > Full disclosure: I've got an x86-specific feature I want to steal a flag > for. Maybe we should just define another VM_ARCH bit. > So you think of something like: #if defined(CONFIG_S390) # define VM_NOZEROPAGE VM_ARCH_1 #endif #ifndef VM_NOZEROPAGE # define VM_NOZEROPAGE VM_NONE #endif right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
