On Monday 13 October 2014 02:50:08 Alex Williamson wrote: > > Why wouldn't we handle this with stubs for `get_cached_msi_msg' and > `write_msi_msg'? We're really not talking about much code that might > get removed by the compiler with this static branch and and it seems > like a rather non-standard mechanism. The count of MSI/X IRQs > advertised to the user should be zero without CONFIG_MSI and later range > checks would prevent calls to > these functions for invalid indexes, so it's a bit of a random test in > the code flow. Thanks, > That's fine with me too. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
