Houston, we have May 15, 1953 (says guest when host uses cpufreq, and dies)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is using cpufreq (i.e. with ondemand governor) on KVM host safe for guests?

I enabled cpufreq on the host, it scaled down the host CPU (Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212) to 1 GHz from 2 GHz.

Guest (using 1 CPU) was still showing that it has a 2 GHz CPU in /proc/cpuinfo (I guess this value is read only once, when booting).

After about 2 hours I started "date" on the guest - it showed that it's year *1953*, after which I couldn't start any other command (the guest was technically alive - SSH connection to it didn't die - but I couldn't do anything).

# date
Wed Feb 18 13:07:17 CET 2009

[let's wait ~2 hours]


# date
Fri May 15 10:13:14 CET 1953
# date
^C^Z
[could not interrupt]


Is it expected behaviour? Is it correct behaviour?


--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux