On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 15:58 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Antonios, > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:46:00PM +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote: > > Exposing the XN flag of the SMMU driver as IOMMU_NOEXEC instead of > > IOMMU_EXEC makes it enforceable, since for IOMMUs that don't support > > the XN flag pages will always be executable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 9 +++++---- > > include/linux/iommu.h | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > [...] > > > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h > > index 20f9a52..e1a644c 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h > > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #define IOMMU_READ (1 << 0) > > #define IOMMU_WRITE (1 << 1) > > #define IOMMU_CACHE (1 << 2) /* DMA cache coherency */ > > -#define IOMMU_EXEC (1 << 3) > > +#define IOMMU_NOEXEC (1 << 3) > > This hunk needs to be a separate patch merged by Joerg before I can take the > arm-smmu part (which looks fine). That separate hunk would be unbuildable since arm-smmu depends on the IOMMU_EXEC define. Patch 2/ is also in iommu code and gates patch 3/ in arm-smmu. The IOMMU-core changes are pretty trivial, so perhaps Joerg would be willing to ACK 1&2 and let Will include the first 3 patches through his tree. These first 3 patches should have been sent on their own since they're small an obvious so they don't get hung up on the reset of the series. Thanks, Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
