Re: [PATCH] kvm: don't take vcpu mutex for obviously invalid vcpu ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:29:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/09/2014 21:20, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> > "while using trinity to fuzz KVM, we noticed long stalls on invalid ioctls. Lets bail out early on invalid ioctls". or similar?
> 
> Okay.  David, can you explain how you found it so that I can make up my
> mind?
> 
> Gleb and Marcelo, a fourth and fifth opinion? :)
> 
I agree with Christian that simpler fix is better here.
The overhead is minimal. If we ever notice this overhead
we can revert the patch all together since the problem it
fixes can only be inflicted on userspace by itself and there
are myriads other ways userspace can hurt itself.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux