Il 20/09/2014 12:47, Tang Chen ha scritto:
> @@ -3624,6 +3624,11 @@ static bool svm_has_secondary_apic_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static void svm_set_apic_access_page_addr(struct kvm *kvm, hpa_t hpa)
> +{
> + return;
> +}
> +
> static int svm_vm_has_apicv(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> return 0;
> @@ -4379,6 +4384,7 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
> .update_cr8_intercept = update_cr8_intercept,
> .set_virtual_x2apic_mode = svm_set_virtual_x2apic_mode,
> .has_secondary_apic_access = svm_has_secondary_apic_access,
> + .set_apic_access_page_addr = svm_set_apic_access_page_addr,
> .vm_has_apicv = svm_vm_has_apicv,
> .load_eoi_exitmap = svm_load_eoi_exitmap,
> .hwapic_isr_update = svm_hwapic_isr_update,
Something's wrong in the way you're generating the patches, because
you're adding these hunks twice.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
