Re: blk-mq crash under KVM in multiqueue block code (with virtio-blk and ext4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 10:09 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 09/12/2014 01:54 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Christian Borntraeger
>>> <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> we have seen the following bug with 3.16 as a KVM guest. It suspect the blk-mq rework that happened between 3.15 and 3.16, but it can be something completely different.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Care to share how you reproduce the issue?
>>
>> Host with 16GB RAM 32GB swap. 15 guest all with 2 GB RAM (and varying amount of CPUs). All do heavy file I/O.
>> It did not happen with 3.15/3.15 in guest/host and does happen with 3.16/3.16. So our next step is to check
>> 3.15/3.16 and 3.16/3.15 to identify if its host memory mgmt or guest block layer.
>
> The crashed happen pretty randomly, but when they happen it seems that its the same trace as below. This makes memory corruption by host vm less likely and some thing wrong in blk-mq more likely I guess
>

Maybe you can try these patches because atomic op
can be reordered on S390:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141094730828533&w=2
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141094730828534&w=2

Thanks
-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux