Il 11/09/2014 05:09, Christoffer Dall ha scritto: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 12:11:19PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 01/09/2014 10:36, Eric Auger ha scritto: >>> No more needed. irq.h would be void on ARM. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> I don't think irq.h is needed anymore since Paul Mackerras' work. However >>> I did not compile for all architectures. >>> --- >>> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 1 - >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>> index 3c5981c..0c712a7 100644 >>> --- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>> +++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c >>> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ >>> #include <linux/seqlock.h> >>> #include <trace/events/kvm.h> >>> >>> -#include "irq.h" >>> #include "iodev.h" >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >>> >> >> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Christoffer, please include this via the ARM tree, together with ARM >> irqfd support. Thanks, >> > Marc is dealing with the tree this week and the next so he can apply it > to kvmarm/queue. Do you want it to wait and go with the irqfd patch > (which has dependencies not yet resolved) or should we just queue it? As you prefer. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
