On Fri, 5 Sep 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 05/09/2014 23:24, Thomas Gleixner ha scritto: > > > >> > that besides acting as a workaround, I find the patched code easier to > >> > understand, and I clearly stated the same in the tag message. > > Well, we might have different opinions about easier to understand. I > > did go a great length to distangle the monotonic boot time on which > > you are interested from xtime, because the latter does not make any > > sense outside of the core timekeeping code. Aside of that I optimized > > the whole thing to avoid conversions, loops and hoops. So you just add > > another multiply and add to make it more understandable. > > Fair enough, I've dropped the patch. Though I agree that the struct member name choice is not the most brilliant one, so feel free to fix that. > Thanks for helping out with the core timekeeping fix. I'm still banging my head against the wall.... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
