Il 29/08/2014 11:12, Nadav Amit ha scritto: > I don’t know. I am looking at Intel SDM table A-6 (Opcode Extensions > for One- and Two-byte Opcodes by Group Number). According to the > table, only group 7 needs RMExt, and in this case the “case > GroupDual” makes the required checks, in the iteration prior to the > “case RMExt”. Therefore this code path, RMExt without GroupDual > before it, should never occur. Nonetheless, if you want to avoid > future bugs, perhaps it is good. Oh, now I understand what you mean. Thanks, Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html