[GIT PULL 03/15] KVM: clarify the idea of kvm_dirty_regs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This patch clarifies that kvm_dirty_regs are just a hint to the kernel and
that the kernel might just ignore some flags and sync the values (like done for
acrs and gprs now).

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index beae3fd..6485750 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -2861,6 +2861,10 @@ kvm_valid_regs for specific bits. These bits are architecture specific
 and usually define the validity of a groups of registers. (e.g. one bit
  for general purpose registers)
 
+Please note that the kernel is allowed to use the kvm_run structure as the
+primary storage for certain register types. Therefore, the kernel may use the
+values in kvm_run even if the corresponding bit in kvm_dirty_regs is not set.
+
 };
 
 
-- 
1.8.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux