Hi Paolo, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:01:07AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >Il 25/08/2014 09:58, Wanpeng Li ha scritto: >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> index c10408e..b7c0073 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c >> @@ -4928,6 +4928,8 @@ static void toggle_interruptibility(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 mask) >> if (!mask) >> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu); >> } >> + if (!(int_shadow || mask)) >> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu); >> } >> >> static void inject_emulated_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > >No, this patch undoes the optimization in the buggy patch. > >A KVM_REQ_EVENT must be missing somewhere else. > Could you give some tips in order that I can figure it out? Regards, Wanpeng Li >Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
