Il 21/08/2014 13:38, Radim Krčmář ha scritto: > 2014-08-21 10:29+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 20/08/2014 22:53, Radim Krčmář ha scritto: >>> Introduce preempt notifiers for architecture specific code. >>> Advantage over creating a new notifier in every arch is slightly simpler >>> code and guaranteed call order with respect to kvm_sched_in. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++++ >>> arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 4 ++++ >>> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++++ >>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 4 ++++ >>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 ++++ >> >> What about adding them as static inlines in >> arch/*/include/asm/kvm_host.h (except for arch/x86 of course)? > > All empty arch functions are in '.c' files, so it seems better to follow > the same path. > (And have one refactoring patch if GCC does not optimize this.) GCC certainly does not optimize this (unless you use LTO). Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
