2014-08-20 09:47+0200, Christian Borntraeger: > On 19/08/14 22:35, Radim Krčmář wrote: > > > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > > @@ -3123,6 +3123,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu) > > if (vcpu->preempted) > > vcpu->preempted = false; > > > > + kvm_arch_sched_in(vcpu, cpu); > > + > > kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu); > > } > > > > Why cant you reuse kvm_arch_vcpu_load? Its also called on each sched_in and is architecture specific. kvm_arch_vcpu_load is also called from kvm_vcpu_ioctl, so we'd be shrinking unnecessarily. (sched_in gives us a bit of useful information about the state of the system, kvm_vcpu_ioctl not that much.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
