On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:30:58PM -0500, Joel Schopp wrote:
>
> #endif /* __ARM_KVM_MMU_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> index 16e7994..70f0f02 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -521,6 +521,7 @@ int create_hyp_io_mappings(void *from, void *to, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
> */
> int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> + unsigned int s2_pgds, s2_pgd_order;
> pgd_t *pgd;
>
> if (kvm->arch.pgd != NULL) {
> @@ -528,10 +529,18 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, S2_PGD_ORDER);
> + s2_pgds = (1 << (kvm_get_phys_addr_shift() - PGDIR_SHIFT));
> + s2_pgd_order = get_order(s2_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t));
> +
> + pgd = (pgd_t *)__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, s2_pgd_order);
> if (!pgd)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + if ((unsigned long)pgd & ~vttbr_baddr_mask) {
> + kvm_err("Stage-2 pgd not correctly aligned: %p\n", pgd);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
>
>
> There are two problems that I've found here. The first problem is that
> vttbr_baddr_mask isn't allocated yet at this point in the code.
allocated? you mean assigned?
aren't you setting vttbr_baddr_mask in kvm_arch_init()? that's
certainly called before kvm_arch_init_vm().
> The
> second problem is that pgd is a virtual address, ie pgd ==
> 0xfffffe03bbb40000 while the vttbr masks off the high bits for a
> physical address, ie vttbr_baddr_mask=0x00007ffffffe0000 . Even
> correcting for those issues I haven't been able to make this check work
> properly. I'll resend v5 the patch with all the other suggested changes.
>
What are the issues that you face? Iow. what is the alignment of the
returned physical address?
(You should be able to just to virt_to_phys(pgd) and use that to test
for the vttbr_baddr_mask).
Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
