> Il 19/08/2014 10:38, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: > >> > The patch may be okay, but I'm worried that it might be hiding a bug in > >> > QEMU. > > On s390 we call "KVM_S390_INITIAL_RESET" from several reset functions, e.g. during > > CPU creation. This is the first hickup and the pid now points to the main thread. > > Any reason to have a special ioctl instead of SET_REGS/SET_ONE_REG/... > (via kvm_cpu_synchronize_state, which does the ioctls in the VCPU thread)? > > Paolo Looking at the code, kvm_cpu_synchronize_state() seems to do these ioctls in the vcpu thread (e.g. comming from cpu_synchronize_all_states()), any reasons why kvm_cpu_synchronize_post_reset() doesn't do the same (e.g. called from cpu_synchronize_all_post_reset())? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
