On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:11:29PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> What's the status of this series? I assume that it's too late for at >> least patches 2-5 to make it into 3.17. > > Which tree were you hoping this patch series to go through? I was > assuming it would go through the x86 tree since the bulk of the > changes in the x86 subsystem (hence my Acked-by). There's some argument that patch 1 should go through the kvm tree. There's no real need for patch 1 and 2-5 to end up in the same kernel release, either. > > IIRC, Peter had some concerns, and I don't remember if they were all > addressed. Peter? > I don't know. I rewrite one thing he didn't like and undid the other, but there's plenty of opportunity for this version to be problematic, too. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
