On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 12:02 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:08:23PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 14:01 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> > >>> Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > >>> > >>>> This is better. > >>>> > >>>> Currently, this code path is posing us big troubles, > >>>> and we won't have a decent patch in time. So, temporarily > >>>> disable it. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Applied to master and kvm-updates/2.6.29, thanks. > >>> > >> Should we add: > >> > >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > >> > > > > I suppose Avi prefers the master->stable route so it can get > > autotested? > > > > But some sort of flag in the commit, like "Stable:Y" would > > help. Could setup a robot to monitor kvm-commits and maintain > > kvm-updates/2.6.2current (the queue to Linus), with human intervention > > when necessary. > > > > Then autotest can run continuously on that. I'm not really following Marcelo here ... > Does 'Cc: stable' mean -stable picks it up automatically? That doesn't > seem right. Yeah, I think if you CC: stable it gets pulled into the stable queue by scripts once linus merges it. Cheers, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
