Re: [PATCH 1/4] kvm: define KVM_CAP_DEVICE_DEASSIGNMENT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Looks good to me, but I wonder why we never used 0x6b-0x6f?

Someone went from 0x69 to 0x70.  I later used 0x6a.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux