Re: [PATCH v2] kvm: x86: fix stale mmio cache bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:10:20PM -0700, David Matlack wrote:
>The following events can lead to an incorrect KVM_EXIT_MMIO bubbling
>up to userspace:
>
>(1) Guest accesses gpa X without a memory slot. The gfn is cached in
>struct kvm_vcpu_arch (mmio_gfn). On Intel EPT-enabled hosts, KVM sets
>the SPTE write-execute-noread so that future accesses cause
>EPT_MISCONFIGs.
>
>(2) Host userspace creates a memory slot via KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION
>covering the page just accessed.
>

One question:

Who trigger host userspace creates a mmio memslot? It will be created
just after first mmio #PF? 

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>(3) Guest attempts to read or write to gpa X again. On Intel, this
>generates an EPT_MISCONFIG. The memory slot generation number that
>was incremented in (2) would normally take care of this but we fast
>path mmio faults through quickly_check_mmio_pf(), which only checks
>the per-vcpu mmio cache. Since we hit the cache, KVM passes a
>KVM_EXIT_MMIO up to userspace.
>
>This patch fixes the issue by doing the following:
>  - Tag the mmio cache with the memslot generation and use it to
>    validate mmio cache lookups.
>  - Extend vcpu_clear_mmio_info to clear mmio_gfn in addition to
>    mmio_gva, since both can be used to fast path mmio faults.
>  - In mmu_sync_roots, unconditionally clear the mmio cache since
>    even direct_map (e.g. tdp) hosts use it.
>
>Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
>Changes in v2:
>  - Use memslot generation to invalidate the mmio cache rather than
>    actively invalidating the cache.
>  - Update patch description with new cache invalidation technique.
>  - Pull mmio cache/clear code up out of x86.h and mmu.c and into
>    mmu.h.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              | 16 ++--------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h              | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.h              | 36 ---------------------
> 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>index 49205d0..f518d14 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>@@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> 	u64 mmio_gva;
> 	unsigned access;
> 	gfn_t mmio_gfn;
>+	unsigned int mmio_gen;
> 
> 	struct kvm_pmu pmu;
> 
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>index 9314678..43f1c18 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>@@ -206,11 +206,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_set_mmio_spte_mask);
> #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_SHIFT		3
> #define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_SHIFT	52
> 
>-#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT			19
> #define MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT		9
> #define MMIO_GEN_LOW_MASK		((1 << MMIO_GEN_LOW_SHIFT) - 1)
>-#define MMIO_GEN_MASK			((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1)
>-#define MMIO_MAX_GEN			((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1)
> 
> static u64 generation_mmio_spte_mask(unsigned int gen)
> {
>@@ -234,16 +231,6 @@ static unsigned int get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte)
> 	return gen;
> }
> 
>-static unsigned int kvm_current_mmio_generation(struct kvm *kvm)
>-{
>-	/*
>-	 * Init kvm generation close to MMIO_MAX_GEN to easily test the
>-	 * code of handling generation number wrap-around.
>-	 */
>-	return (kvm_memslots(kvm)->generation +
>-		      MMIO_MAX_GEN - 150) & MMIO_GEN_MASK;
>-}
>-
> static void mark_mmio_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, u64 gfn,
> 			   unsigned access)
> {
>@@ -3157,13 +3144,14 @@ static void mmu_sync_roots(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 	int i;
> 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
> 
>+	vcpu_clear_mmio_info(vcpu, MMIO_GVA_ANY);
>+
> 	if (vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map)
> 		return;
> 
> 	if (!VALID_PAGE(vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa))
> 		return;
> 
>-	vcpu_clear_mmio_info(vcpu, ~0ul);
> 	kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, AUDIT_PRE_SYNC);
> 	if (vcpu->arch.mmu.root_level == PT64_ROOT_LEVEL) {
> 		hpa_t root = vcpu->arch.mmu.root_hpa;
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>index b982112..058651a 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
>@@ -82,6 +82,76 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *context,
> void update_permission_bitmask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
> 		bool ept);
> 
>+#define MMIO_GEN_SHIFT                 19
>+#define MMIO_GEN_MASK                  ((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1)
>+#define MMIO_MAX_GEN                   ((1 << MMIO_GEN_SHIFT) - 1)
>+static inline unsigned int kvm_current_mmio_generation(struct kvm *kvm)
>+{
>+	/*
>+	 * Init kvm generation close to MMIO_MAX_GEN to easily test the
>+	 * code of handling generation number wrap-around.
>+	 */
>+	return (kvm_memslots(kvm)->generation + MMIO_MAX_GEN - 150) &
>+	       MMIO_GEN_MASK;
>+}
>+
>+static inline void vcpu_cache_mmio_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>+					gva_t gva, gfn_t gfn, unsigned access)
>+{
>+	vcpu->arch.mmio_gen = kvm_current_mmio_generation(vcpu->kvm);
>+
>+	/*
>+	 * Ensure that the mmio_gen is set before the rest of the cache entry.
>+	 * Otherwise we might see a new generation number attached to an old
>+	 * cache entry if creating/deleting a memslot races with mmio caching.
>+	 * The inverse case is possible (old generation number with new cache
>+	 * info), but that is safe. The next access will just miss the cache
>+	 * when it should have hit.
>+	 */
>+	smp_wmb();
>+
>+	vcpu->arch.mmio_gva = gva & PAGE_MASK;
>+	vcpu->arch.access = access;
>+	vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn = gfn;
>+}
>+
>+/*
>+ * Clear the mmio cache info for the given gva. If gva is MMIO_GVA_ANY,
>+ * unconditionally clear the mmio cache.
>+ */
>+#define MMIO_GVA_ANY ~((gva_t) 0)
>+static inline void vcpu_clear_mmio_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>+{
>+	if (gva != MMIO_GVA_ANY && vcpu->arch.mmio_gva != (gva & PAGE_MASK))
>+		return;
>+
>+	vcpu->arch.mmio_gva = 0;
>+	vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn = 0;
>+}
>+
>+static inline bool vcpu_match_mmio_gen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>+{
>+	return vcpu->arch.mmio_gen == kvm_current_mmio_generation(vcpu->kvm);
>+}
>+
>+static inline bool vcpu_match_mmio_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva)
>+{
>+	u64 mmio_gva = vcpu->arch.mmio_gva;
>+
>+	return vcpu_match_mmio_gen(vcpu) &&
>+	       mmio_gva &&
>+	       mmio_gva == (gva & PAGE_MASK);
>+}
>+
>+static inline bool vcpu_match_mmio_gpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa)
>+{
>+	gfn_t mmio_gfn = vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn;
>+
>+	return vcpu_match_mmio_gen(vcpu) &&
>+	       mmio_gfn &&
>+	       mmio_gfn == (gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>+}
>+
> static inline unsigned int kvm_mmu_available_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> 	if (kvm->arch.n_max_mmu_pages > kvm->arch.n_used_mmu_pages)
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>index 8c97bac..c686c91 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
>@@ -72,42 +72,6 @@ static inline u32 bit(int bitno)
> 	return 1 << (bitno & 31);
> }
> 
>-static inline void vcpu_cache_mmio_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>-					gva_t gva, gfn_t gfn, unsigned access)
>-{
>-	vcpu->arch.mmio_gva = gva & PAGE_MASK;
>-	vcpu->arch.access = access;
>-	vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn = gfn;
>-}
>-
>-/*
>- * Clear the mmio cache info for the given gva,
>- * specially, if gva is ~0ul, we clear all mmio cache info.
>- */
>-static inline void vcpu_clear_mmio_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
>-{
>-	if (gva != (~0ul) && vcpu->arch.mmio_gva != (gva & PAGE_MASK))
>-		return;
>-
>-	vcpu->arch.mmio_gva = 0;
>-}
>-
>-static inline bool vcpu_match_mmio_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long gva)
>-{
>-	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_gva && vcpu->arch.mmio_gva == (gva & PAGE_MASK))
>-		return true;
>-
>-	return false;
>-}
>-
>-static inline bool vcpu_match_mmio_gpa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa)
>-{
>-	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn && vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn == gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>-		return true;
>-
>-	return false;
>-}
>-
> void kvm_before_handle_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> void kvm_after_handle_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq, int inc_eip);
>-- 
>2.0.0.526.g5318336
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux