Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: nested TPR shadow/threshold emulation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 31/07/2014 10:03, Wanpeng Li ha scritto:
>> One thing:
>>
>>> +	if (nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW))
>>> +		vmcs_write32(TPR_THRESHOLD, vmcs12->tpr_threshold);
>>
>> I think you can just do this write unconditionally, since most
>> hypervisors will enable this.  Also, you probably can add the tpr
> 
> What will happen if a hypervisor doesn't enable it? I make it more 
> cleaner in version two.

TPR_THRESHOLD will be likely written as zero, but the processor will
never use it anyway.  It's just a small optimization because
nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW) will almost always be true.

Paolo

>> threshold field to the read-write fields for shadow VMCS.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Regards,
> Wanpeng Li 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux