On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:06 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2014, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>
>> This patch removes a fix me by including linux/types.h in kvm_para.h
>> as stated by the fix me in main.c and also removes the comment from
>> main.c too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/kvm_para.h | 3 +--
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
>> index f961de9..7ba314b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>>
>> #define DEBUG
>>
>> -#include <linux/types.h> /* FIXME: kvm_para.h needs this */
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>>
>> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
>> #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_para.h b/include/linux/kvm_para.h
>> index 00a97bb..21d1be2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/kvm_para.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_para.h
>> @@ -2,8 +2,7 @@
>> #define __LINUX_KVM_PARA_H
>>
>> #include <uapi/linux/kvm_para.h>
>> -
>> -
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> static inline int kvm_para_has_feature(unsigned int feature)
>> {
>> if (kvm_arch_para_features() & (1UL << feature))
>
> There's no build error reported that would indicate that this is needed,
> so this patch isn't justifiable.
David,
Good to hear a nicer reply after my stupid patch with page shifts.
Would you like me to send in a patch that removes this fix me
then?
Nick :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
