On 22/07/14 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/07/2014 21:14, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: >> From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> We should advertise all capabilities, including those that can >> be enabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> index dd902e6..339b34a 100644 >> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c >> @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) >> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD: >> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: >> case KVM_CAP_ENABLE_CAP_VM: >> + case KVM_CAP_S390_IRQCHIP: >> case KVM_CAP_VM_ATTRIBUTES: >> case KVM_CAP_MP_STATE: >> r = 1; >> > > Should I apply this to 3.16 as well (or Cc: stable)? > Hmm, userspace currently does not care. But Cc: stable 3.15 and 3.16 might be "the right thing to do". Thanks for noticing. Christian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
