Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] KVM: s390: Let user space control the cpu states

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 21/07/2014 09:47, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto:
> So having such a state wont buy us much. It would be even wrong, because
> we want our MP_STATE defines to be a 1:1 match of the states that are defined
> in the architecture as proper CPU states. Some of the SIGP calls will return the
> state of the target CPU and that depends on the CPU state as defined in the
> architecture. The wait bit does not have an influence on the return value.

Thanks for the explanation.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux