On 2014-07-15 14:40, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>> ......
>> 7922 if (!vmx->nested.apic_access_page)
>> 7923 exec_control &=
>> 7924 ~SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
>> 7925 else
>> 7926 vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
>> 7927 page_to_phys(vmx->nested.apic_access_page));
>> 7928 } else if
>> (vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) {
>> 7929 exec_control |=
>> 7930 SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
>> 7931 vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
>> 7932 page_to_phys(vcpu->kvm->arch.apic_access_page));
>> 7933 }
>>
>> And yes, we have the problem you said here. We can migrate the page while L2
>> vm is running.
>> So I think we should enforce L2 vm to exit to L1. Right ?
>>
> We can request APIC_ACCESS_ADDR reload during L2->L1 vmexit emulation, so
> if APIC_ACCESS_ADDR changes while L2 is running it will be reloaded for L1 too.
How should this host-managed VMCS field possibly change while L2 is running?
Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
