Re: copyless virtio net thoughts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 06 February 2009, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Well, these guests will suck both on baremetal and in virtualisation,
> > big deal :) Multiqueue at 10GbE speeds and above is simply not an
> > optional feature.
> >   
> 
> Each guest may only use a part of the 10Gb/s bandwidth, if you have 10 
> guests each using 1Gb/s, then we should be able to support this without 
> multiqueue in the guests.

I would expect that there are people that even people with 10 simultaneous
guests would like to be able to saturate the link when only one or two of
them are doing much traffic on the interface.

Having the load spread evenly over all guests sounds like a much rarer
use case.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux