Re: status of reducing context switching overhead in KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 09:18:33AM +0800, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> Thanks, Rik
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 06/21/2014 04:55 AM, Xuekun Hu wrote:
> >> Hi, Rik
> >>
> >> I saw your presentation at last year 2013 kvm submit.
> >> (http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/2/27/Kvm-forum-2013-idle-latency.pdf).
> >>
> >>
> > You said there will have some patches later, but I didn't find them.
> >> Are you continuing to do the optimization work? Any updates? :-)
> >
> > I have gotten side-tracked by the automatic NUMA balancing work,
> > but Michael Tsirkin has been doing some work on reducing idle
> > latencies.
> >
> Michael, may I know your status of the work on reducing idle latencies?
> Many thanks.

I have a prototype - still working on it.
Would you be interested in testing?

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux