On 06/18/2014 01:55 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> The following CPU features were never supported by neither TCG or KVM,
> so they are useless on the CPU model definitions, today:
>
The overall idea of this series makes sense to me (yes, I'd love to get
libvirt to the point that we can use enforce mode), but I decline to
review the actual contents (it's a bit over my head how all the models
work) and leave it to the experts. But here's a trivial finding:
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 8de1566..2f32d29 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
> @@ -680,10 +680,11 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[] = {
> .family = 16,
> .model = 2,
> .stepping = 3,
> + /* MIssing: CPUID_HT */
s/MIssing/Missing/
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
