RE: [PATCH v3] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Enhance tlb invalidation condition on vcpu schedule

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:05 PM
> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-
> dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Enhance tlb invalidation
> condition on vcpu schedule
> 
> On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 15:02 -0500, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:48 PM
> > > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> > > Cc: kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-
> > > dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: PPC: e500mc: Enhance tlb invalidation
> > > condition on vcpu schedule
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 14:42 -0500, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> wrote:
> > > > > > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu *, last_vcpu_on_cpu);
> > > > > > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_vcpu * [KVMPPC_NR_LPIDS],
> > > > > last_vcpu_on_cpu);
> > > > >
> > > > > Hmm, I didn't know you could express types like that.  Is this
> > > special
> > > > > syntax that only works for typeof?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, AFAIK.
> > > >
> > > > > No space after *
> > > >
> > > > Checkpatch complains about the missing space ;)
> > >
> > > Checkpatch is wrong, which isn't surprising given that this is
> unusual
> > > syntax.  We don't normally put a space after * when used to represent
> a
> > > pointer.
> >
> > This is not something new. See [PATCH 04/10] percpu: cleanup percpu
> array
> > definitions:
> >
> > 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/24/26
> 
> I didn't say it was new, just unusual, and checkpatch doesn't recognize
> it.  Checkpatch shouldn't be blindly and silently obeyed when it says
> something strange.

I agree with you about the syntax and I know other cases where checkpatch
is a moron. For similar corner cases checkpatch maintainers did not wanted
(or found it difficult) to make an exception. I would also like to see Alex
opinion on this.

-Mike


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux