On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 04:25:28PM +0100, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 16:04 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 06:03:11PM +0100, Antonios Motakis wrote: > > > The ARM SMMU supports the IOMMU_NOEXEC protection flag. Add the > > > corresponding IOMMU capability. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > > > index d5a2200..15ab2af 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > > > @@ -1544,6 +1544,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_domain_has_cap(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > > if (smmu_domain->root_cfg.smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK) > > > caps |= IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY; > > > > > > + caps |= IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC; > > > + > > > > Just initialise caps to IOMMU_CAP_NOEXEC. > > No, it shouldn't be a bitmap in the first place. Thanks, Ah, ok. I probably led Antonios down the garden path with the ARM SMMU driver then. Apologies! Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
