[PATCH 3/5] KVM: nVMX: Allow to disable CR3 access interception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>

We already had this control enabled by exposing the broken
MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS value. This now advertises our capability by
clearing the right bits in MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS. We also
have to ensure to test the right value on L2 entry.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index cb43883..475f2dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -2239,6 +2239,7 @@ static inline bool nested_vmx_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  * or other means.
  */
 static u32 nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low, nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high;
+static u32 nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low;
 static u32 nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high;
 static u32 nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_low, nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high;
 static u32 nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low, nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high;
@@ -2329,6 +2330,10 @@ static __init void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
 	nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high |= CPU_BASED_ALWAYSON_WITHOUT_TRUE_MSR |
 		CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS;
 
+	/* We support free control of CR3 access interception. */
+	nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low = nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low &
+		~(CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING | CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING);
+
 	/* secondary cpu-based controls */
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2,
 		nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high);
@@ -2396,6 +2401,9 @@ static int vmx_get_vmx_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr_index, u64 *pdata)
 					nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high);
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PROCBASED_CTLS:
+		*pdata = vmx_control_msr(nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low,
+					nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high);
+		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS:
 		*pdata = vmx_control_msr(nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low,
 					nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high);
@@ -8128,7 +8136,8 @@ static int nested_vmx_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool launch)
 	}
 
 	if (!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control,
-	      nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low, nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high) ||
+				nested_vmx_true_procbased_ctls_low,
+				nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high) ||
 	    !vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control,
 	      nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high) ||
 	    !vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control,
-- 
1.8.1.1.298.ge7eed54

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux