On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 06:12:07PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > { > struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu; > @@ -407,6 +551,20 @@ int kvm_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) > return 0; > } > break; > + case MSR_IA32_DS_AREA: > + pmu->ds_area = data; > + return 0; > + case MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE: > + if (data & ~0xf0000000fULL) > + break; Bit 63 == PS_ENABLE ? > void kvm_handle_pmu_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 33e8c02..4f39917 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -7288,6 +7288,12 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > atomic_switch_perf_msrs(vmx); > debugctlmsr = get_debugctlmsr(); > > + /* Move this somewhere else? */ Unless you hook into vcpu->arch.pmu.ds_area and perf_get_ds_area() writers, it has to be at every vcpu entry. Could compare values in MSR save area to avoid switch. > + if (vcpu->arch.pmu.ds_area) > + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, > + vcpu->arch.pmu.ds_area, > + perf_get_ds_area()); Should clear_atomic_switch_msr before add_atomic_switch_msr. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html