On 06/06/2014 03:09 AM, Mario Smarduch wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 11:55 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 06/05/2014 05:11 AM, Mario Smarduch wrote:
>>
>>> + spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < n / sizeof(long); i++) {
>>> + unsigned long mask;
>>> + gfn_t offset;
>>> +
>>> + if (!dirty_bitmap[i])
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + is_dirty = true;
>>> +
>>> + mask = xchg(&dirty_bitmap[i], 0);
>>> + dirty_bitmap_buffer[i] = mask;
>>> +
>>> + offset = i * BITS_PER_LONG;
>>> + kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked(kvm, memslot, offset, mask);
>>> + }
>>> + if (is_dirty)
>>> + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
>>
>> You moved the flush into mmu-lock. Please do not :).
>>
>> See commit 198c74f43f0f5473f99967aead30ddc622804bc1
>>
>
> Thanks for reviewing, I revised to pick up your version.
>
> Functionally there should be no impact on ARM, the
> TLB flush function is different.
Yeah, i agree your point on ARM, but your patch moved
the function from x86 to the common code, that means
this function is reused between ARM and x86. No?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
