https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77271 --- Comment #2 from Jidong Xiao <jidong.xiao@xxxxxxxxx> --- Oh, thanks Alex. I think you are right here, it's not a bug. But do you think that, does it make sense to submit a patch to qemu, so as to make them consistent between userspace qemu and the kernel side kvm? Like this: diff --git a/qemu-2.0.0/target-i386/kvm.c.orig b/qemu-2.0.0/target-i386/kvm.c index 4389959..b8b282d 100644 --- a/qemu-2.0.0/target-i386/kvm.c.orig +++ b/qemu-2.0.0/target-i386/kvm.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *cs) memcpy(signature, "KVMKVMKVM\0\0\0", 12); c = &cpuid_data.entries[cpuid_i++]; c->function = KVM_CPUID_SIGNATURE | kvm_base; - c->eax = 0; + c->eax = KVM_CPUID_FEATURES; c->ebx = signature[0]; c->ecx = signature[1]; c->edx = signature[2]; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
