On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 17:45 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > +/* Values for 2nd argument to H_SET_MODE */
> > > +#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_SET_CIABR 1
> > > +#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_SET_DAWR 2
> > > +#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_ADDR_TRANS_MODE 3
> > > +#define H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_LE 4
> >
> > Much better, but I think you want to make use of these in non-kvm code too,
> > no? At least the LE one is definitely already implemented as call :)
>
> powerpc/pseries: Use new defines when calling h_set_mode
>
> Now that we define these in the KVM code, use these defines when we call
> h_set_mode. No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> This depends on the KVM h_set_mode patches.
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
> index 12c32c5..67859ed 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static inline long plpar_set_mode(unsigned long mflags, unsigned long resource,
> static inline long enable_reloc_on_exceptions(void)
> {
> /* mflags = 3: Exceptions at 0xC000000000004000 */
> - return plpar_set_mode(3, 3, 0, 0);
> + return plpar_set_mode(3, H_SET_MODE_RESOURCE_ADDR_TRANS_MODE, 0, 0);
> }
Which header are these coming from, and why aren't we including it? And is it
going to still build with CONFIG_KVM=n?
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
