On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 09:31:02AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 06:39 AM, James Hogan wrote:
> [...]
> >>diff --git a/arch/mips/paravirt/paravirt-irq.c b/arch/mips/paravirt/paravirt-irq.c
> >>new file mode 100644
> >>index 0000000..e1603dd
> >>--- /dev/null
> >>+++ b/arch/mips/paravirt/paravirt-irq.c
> [...]
> >
> >>+static void irq_core_set_enable_local(void *arg)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct irq_data *data = arg;
> >>+ struct core_chip_data *cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> >>+ unsigned int mask = 0x100 << cd->bit;
> >>+
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * Interrupts are already disabled, so these are atomic.
> >
> >Really? Even when called directly from irq_core_bus_sync_unlock with
> >only a single core online?
> >
>
> Yes, but...
>
>
> >>+ */
> >>+ if (cd->desired_en)
> >>+ set_c0_status(mask);
> >>+ else
> >>+ clear_c0_status(mask);
> >>+
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static void irq_core_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct core_chip_data *cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> >>+ cd->desired_en = false;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static void irq_core_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct core_chip_data *cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> >>+ cd->desired_en = true;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static void irq_core_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct core_chip_data *cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> >>+
> >>+ mutex_lock(&cd->core_irq_mutex);
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static void irq_core_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct core_chip_data *cd = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> >>+
> >>+ if (cd->desired_en != cd->current_en) {
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * Can be called in early init when on_each_cpu() will
> >>+ * unconditionally enable irqs, so handle the case
> >>+ * where only a single CPU is online specially, and
> >>+ * directly call.
> >>+ */
> >>+ if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
> >>+ irq_core_set_enable_local(data);
> >>+ else
> >>+ on_each_cpu(irq_core_set_enable_local, data, 1);
> >>+
>
>
> ... This code is not correct. It was initially done as a
> workaround for the issues fixed in commit 202da4005.
>
> Now that on_each_cpu() is less buggy, we can unconditionally use it
> and the assertion above about "Interrupts are already disabled" will
> be true.
I'll adapt this in the next version of the patch.
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
