On 20/05/14 15:47, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This returns the CPUNum from the low order Ebase bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h
> index 3e025b5..f110d48 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h
> @@ -1916,6 +1916,11 @@ __BUILD_SET_C0(brcm_cmt_ctrl)
> __BUILD_SET_C0(brcm_config)
> __BUILD_SET_C0(brcm_mode)
>
> +static inline unsigned int mips_cpunum(void)
> +{
> + return read_c0_ebase() & 0x3ff; /* Low 10 bits of ebase. */
> +}
If this is going to go in mips generic code I think it should be clearly
defined, especially in the presence of MT, otherwise perhaps it makes
sense for it to go in a paravirt specific header?
I.e. does it return the core number of the running VPE (if so it should
probably do something like below as in decode_configs() and go in
smp.h), or does it simply always return that field in ebase register (in
which case it should probably have ebase in the name and a comment to
clarify that it doesn't necessarily map directly to core/vpe number).
unsigned int core = read_c0_ebase() & 0x3ff;
if (cpu_has_mipsmt)
core >>= fls(smp_num_siblings) - 1;
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
