Il 26/04/2014 00:34, James Hogan ha scritto:
So yes, you could technically manage without (4) by using (2) ((4) was implemented first), but I think it probably still has some value since you can do it with a single ioctl rather than 4 ioctls (freeze timer, read resume_time, read or write count, unfreeze timer). Enough value to be worthwhile? I haven't really made up my mind yet but I'm leaning towards yes.
It would be interesting to see how the userspace patches use this independent of COUNT_RESUME.
Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
