On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:40:17AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > On 04/22/2014 07:57 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 22/04/14 12:55, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> While preparing/testing some KVM on s390 patches for the next merge window (target is kvm/next which is based on 3.15-rc1) I faced a very severe performance hickup on guest paging (all anonymous memory). > >> > >> All memory bound guests are in "D" state now and the system is barely unusable. > >> > >> Reverting commit 0bf1457f0cfca7bc026a82323ad34bcf58ad035d > >> "mm: vmscan: do not swap anon pages just because free+file is low" makes the problem go away. > >> > >> According to /proc/vmstat the system is now in direct reclaim almost all the time for every page fault (more than 10x more direct reclaims than kswap reclaims) > >> With the patch being reverted everything is fine again. > >> > >> Any ideas? > > > > Here is an idea to tackle my problem and the original problem: > > > > reverting 0bf1457f0cfca7bc026a82323ad34bcf58ad035d + checking against low, also seems to make my system usable. > > > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, > > */ > > if (global_reclaim(sc)) { > > free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES); > > - if (unlikely(file + free <= high_wmark_pages(zone))) { > > + if (unlikely(file + free <= low_wmark_pages(zone))) { > > scan_balance = SCAN_ANON; > > goto out; > > } > > > > Looks reasonable to me. +1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html