On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 08:22:13AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > But rethinking this again, I agree with you. If there's a hypervisor > > with a single context invept implmentation that does not fallback, > > this will unfortunately not work. Jan, do you agree with this ? > > A hypervisor that doesn't properly check the HW caps is just broken. And > one that mandates single context invalidation support is silly. Is this a justification for removing INVEPT single-context until it is implemented as single-context? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
