Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:

   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.

I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.
Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your patches Peter?
I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-(


Peter's patch is a rewrite of my patches 1-4, there is no PV or unfair lock support in there.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux